![]() | ![]() |
Gina Kolata:
Senior Writer for The New York Times, and Author of Rethinking Thin, and Flu, a Bestseller Other Links
Books
![]() Rethinking Thin: The New Science of Weight Lossand the Myths and Realities of Dieting ![]() Flu: The Story of the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 and the Search for the Virus That Caused It |
Exclusively Represented
by The Lavin Agency
GINA
KOLATA "New York Times reporter Gina Kolata
may be the best writer around covering the science of health," Publishers
Weekly recently wrote. With scientific, medical and health concernson
both a personal and a global scaleat the forefront of the national
conversation, Kolata continues to ask the big questions about these pressing
issues.
A senior writer at The New York Times, Gina
Kolata writes accessibly about the sometimes confounding scientific and
personal health issues of the day, while never compromising on breadth
or depth of coverage. She has broken stories about avian flu, stem cell
research, new treatments for cancer, advances in cloning, the latest in
disease prevention, wait times in hospitals, the use of drugs in sports,
and common household dangers. On more than one occasion, her writing has
upended conventional wisdom.
Her critically acclaimed new book, Rethinking Thin, reveals that our society's obsession with losing weight is less about keeping trim and staying healthy than about money, power, politics, trends, and impossible ideals. Kolata takes us through a history of the place of diets in American society, explains the science of obesity and dieting, and offers a provocative critique of the powerful weight-loss industry. According to Publishers Weekly, the book "will change your thinking about weight, whether you struggle with it or not." Kolata is the author of five previous books, including Ultimate Fitness: The Quest for Truth About Exercise and Health and the bestseller Flu: The Story of the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 and the Search for the Virus That Caused It, which was recently re-released with a new epilogue on avian flu. A Pulitzer Prize finalist, Kolata was a speaker at the Program for Science and Humanities at Yale School of Medicine, and at the Wilson School at Princeton, where, as a visiting professor, she also taught a seminar on science writing. She has received many awards for her journalism, including the prestigious Susan G. Komen Foundation's media award for reporting on women's issues and breast cancer. What does Gina Kolata talk about?
Rethinking Thin
In a starred review, Booklist called Kolata's
Rethinking Thin "An unbiased look at society's war on fatness."
In her eye-opening talks based on the book, Kolata, a charming and authoritative
speaker, offers a lively and liberating challenge to the conventional
wisdom about diets and weight loss, tackling many vital questions from
an objective point of view: Why do people remain overweight when there
is so much social pressure to be thin? Why does every diet reach a plateau
where weight loss stalls? How important are genes in determining your
weight, and how important are psychological factors, like stress? Is
there such a thing as willpower when it comes to eating and body weight?
Is hunger the same experience for everyone? What is the weight that
is right for our bodies?
The 1918 Influenza Pandemic: Does It Hold Lessons
for Today?
The 1918 influenza was a bird flu that caused the
worst infectious disease epidemic ever, killing more people than any
other disease of that duration in the history of the world. If a similar
epidemic were to strike today, with the same death rate, it would kill
more people in just a few months than die in a year from the major killersheart
disease, cancer, chronic pulmonary disease, stroke, and Alzheimer'scombined.
The 1918 influenza killed mainly young adults, between the ages of 20
and 40. Gina Kolata asks: just how frightened should we be that another
epidemic will come again? Are we prepared? And how can the media strike
a balance between reporting the news and scaring everyone beyond reason?
Stem Cells: Hope or Hype?
The debate over stem cell research is one of the
most important, and controversial, dialogues taking place in America
today. Stemming from highly emotional arguments on both sides, this
subject is in the headlines every day, and will, if anything, only become
more complicated as both sides move forward with their positions. Gina
Kolata takes us simultaneously deep into the debate, while also pulling
out, to get an objective look, away from the charged commentators. How
did we ever get to such a state? What is the truth about stem cells
and what do scientists really think will come of research with them?
Reporting on Environmental Risks: Lessons Learned
Gina Kolata chooses stories in which environmental
risks are not what they at first appear to beand that's no coincidence.
Of course chemicals and drugs and pollutants can be risky. Of course
people have become sick or even died from exposure to toxins. But many
of the exposures that have gotten the most attention have, on closer
examination, turned out to be not quite what many people believe. When
it comes to environmental hazards, deciding whether there is a risk
and, if so, how much and what to do about it, is far from straightforward.
It is not always easy to see why a frightening report of a health risk
is wrong. In this presentation, Kolata takes us back over a career of
covering environmental risks, and shares her many hard-earned insights.
On Being a Patient
Last year, The New York Times ran a high-profile
series called "On Being a Patient." Kolata wrote in-depth
about waiting in roomsemergency rooms, examining rooms, and, of
course, waiting rooms. She wrote about difficult doctors who leave you
feeling dehumanized, and make you want to swear off the whole medical
profession. In this presentation, Kolata recalls her search for three
important things: real data on waiting times that would establish whether
there was a problem and, if so, how big it was and where it was most
manifest; methods to alleviate waiting times and reliable data on how
effective they are; and credible stories from patients who have suffered
from long waits. None were easy to find because it seemed that no one
had pulled these data together before and people who had one part of
the picture, like alleviating waits in hospitals, did not have other
parts, like alleviating waits for medical records or waits in doctors'
waiting rooms.
Go to Top of Page
|
||