Words Can Speak Louder Than Lab Results: Pamela Meyer On Liespotting
Meyer, a Certified Fraud Examiner, picked apart the culprit's statements to the media. Here are some of the key indicators she uncovered that clearly point to guilt:
1) Never directly addressing the allegations: In many of his statements, the actual accusation was never explicitly mentioned. Not only did he sidestep discussing the charges of using PEDs, but Meyers points out that he never outwardly denied them, either. "[He] fails to simply deny the accusation, the straightest and frankest way to respond to an allegation," she says.
2) Eluding to there being more to the story—without ever telling the whole story: "Referencing 'the entire story' suggests we're only scratching the surface of the abuse," Meyers notes. "[He] suggests that there is a fat, rich story just bubbling beneath the outward accusations of abuse."
3) Gross exaggeration: Several times, he makes overzealous and bolstering statements to make it seem like he's being sincere. His attempt to seem like an innocent man wronged ends up reading like a desperately guilty man trying to feign innocence.
4) Using conditional tense: The words "if I had done it" aren't usually uttered by an innocent person. Also, he introduces the possibility of "unintentional" misconduct—another thing an innocent person would be highly unlikely to ever do.
5) Using distancing language: He implies guilt "through his failure to directly name the drugs he is accused of abusing and through his failure to own up to the act in the first person."
In her fascinating keynotes and workshops, Meyer brings the science of lie detection and interrogation to the business world. If you hire Pamela Meyer as a speaker, you and your team will acquire a new set of face-to-face skills to flush out deception, avoid potentially costly encounters, and build a trustworthy team.