Kurt Eichenwald's 500 Days: A Necessarily Dispassionate Narrative on 9/11 [VIDEO]
"Facts were never portrayed in the context of what happened," he said, "[they were] portrayed in the context of 'what do I think about what I think happened?'" With the media providing no real in-depth, factual account of the events, he said he, "decided there needed to be a dispassionate narrative." In the interview, Eichenwald answered questions both from a moderator and the audience, explaining that his account of the 500 days after 9/11 was an attempt to give people more information without clouding their judgment with opinions. Something, he jokes, was difficult considering there are—and will always be—people on both sides who think you are biased when it comes to political discussion.
"When you get further and further out, people have less and less information," he said. He added that when people have less information, the decisions made by other people seem simple, when, in reality, the decisions on policy after 9/11 were far from easy to make. By writing the book, he said he hopes to have created an account of the events to help people understand the complexities surrounding the situation. In a style similar to his two other books, Conspiracy of Fools and The Informant (the former soon to be a film starring Leonardo DiCaprio and the latter, a major motion picture starring Matt Damon), 500 Days is intellectually stimulating and fast-paced. When writing, or when speaking before an audience, Eichenwald digs to the heart of some of our most pressing issues—and uncovers truths that open our eyes to what's truly happening in the world around us.